Strategy: The Invisible System That Holds Your Mission Together

Written by: Gigi Aulsebrook

August 11, 2025

Photo by Jukan Tateisi on Unsplash
Table of Contents

Stop writing strategy. Start building it.

In mission-driven work, strategy is often treated like a deliverable, something essentially to be drafted, approved, and shared. A document to tick off a list, perhaps reviewed once or twice a year, and then tucked into a folder. But if you’ve spent any time within a nonprofit, a social enterprise, a grassroots movement, or a philanthropic fund, you’ll know that the work rarely follows the plan. Context constantly shifts, priorities always compete and of course resources tighten. People come and go. And somewhere between field visits, funding deadlines, and internal pressures, the beautifully written and formatted strategy begins to drift. It becomes less present, less practical and, almost always, no longer useful to the people doing the work.

Still, the need for clarity and direction doesn’t disappear. If anything, it becomes more urgent. Which is why the conversation so often returns to the same question: “Do we need a new strategy?” It’s a fair question and sometimes: yes, a new strategic process is necessary. But more often than not, the real issue isn’t the strategy itself. It’s that there’s no meaningful system in place to carry it forward. So the more powerful question becomes: “What kind of clarity do we need and how do we build it into the way we work, not just the way we talk?”

At Gia, we believe that strategy isn’t something you write. It’s something you build and over time, it becomes the invisible system that holds your mission together.

Strategy is the architecture of value creation

Strategy is not a promise or a prediction. It is not a vision board or a theory of change on a PDF. Strategy is the architecture of value creation. It is the set of structures, choices, and principles that shape how your organisation makes sense of its purpose and delivers on it again and again… even in changing, uncertain, or difficult circumstances. It lives in every aspect of your work but it is rarely visible, but you will notice when it’s not there. The lack of strategy can result in delayed decisions, repeated confusion, meetings that circle around the same issues with little or no progress. Without a strategy that is alive and usable, the work becomes more difficult to navigate. This has nothing to do with the mission being wrong, rather it’s because the infrastructure to carry it is too weak or too vague.

We’ve seen this happen across sectors and contexts. Organisations with brilliant people and bold missions, but with no coherent system for turning that boldness into aligned and confident action. As a result, energy disperses, opportunities slip away, and capacity is consumed by managing ambiguity instead of driving impact. What these teams usually need is a way to make the existing strategy real, rather than the creation of more documents.

What strategy makes possible

A strong strategy creates the conditions for coherence, alignment, and responsiveness. When done well, it makes people feel more confident. This isn’t because everything is predictable, but because the organisation knows what it stands for and how it chooses to act.

At Gia, we often bring three core lenses to the strategy work we do with our partners. These are not steps in a process, but perspectives we return to again and again: the purpose lens, the system lens, and the decision lens.

The purpose lens: Clarifying what matters most

The purpose lens is where we begin. It asks us to slow down and reflect on what the organisation truly exists to do, not just in broad terms. But specifically, here and now. Who are you accountable to? Whose lives or realities are you seeking to shift or protect? What needs are you uniquely positioned to respond to? And which ones are outside your role? Without this grounding, strategy risks becoming inflated or overextended. A clear, specific purpose allows for more focused, meaningful work, and makes it easier to say no to what falls outside of it.

This lens challenges organisations to examine:

  • What change are we trying to create, and how will we know it’s happening?
  • Are we clear on who benefits from our work, directly, indirectly, and unintentionally?
  • Where is our purpose most alive? Where is it getting lost?
  • Are we solving for symptoms, or addressing root causes?
  • Have we outgrown our original purpose, or does it still serve us?
  • What do our partners, communities, or beneficiaries understand our purpose to be, and does that match how we describe it?
  • What is no longer serving our mission, even if it once did?

The system lens: Turning purpose into infrastructure

The system lens helps us understand what needs to be built or strengthened in order for that purpose to be delivered. Purpose without a system often leads to burnout or stagnation. What practices, processes, and feedback loops enable your organisation to learn, adapt, and deliver consistently? Where are decisions getting stuck? Where is knowledge concentrated in one person, or disappearing altogether? Strategy must live within your systems. Otherwise, it stays theoretical, disconnected from the reality of how work gets done.

This lens invites deeper reflection on internal mechanics:

  • What systems or habits make it easy to act on our purpose? What makes it hard?
  • How do ideas move through the organisation, from insight to action?
  • Where is coordination failing or being carried by individuals rather than systems?
  • What happens when a team member leaves, what is lost?
  • How do we capture and share learning across teams or projects?
  • What rituals or routines anchor our work, and which ones drain energy?
  • Do we have the information we need, when we need it, to make good decisions?
  • Are our accountability structures aligned with what we say we value?

The decision lens: Embedding alignment and trust

Finally, the decision lens allows us to examine how judgment is exercised across the organisation. This is especially important in contexts where there is no perfect answer. What principles guide you when things are uncertain? What trade-offs are you willing to make, and what are your non-negotiables? How do you choose between competing demands? Not once, but repeatedly, over time? The goal here isn’t to eliminate uncertainty, but to ensure that people can navigate it in ways that are aligned with your values and consistent with your mission.

This lens pushes us to look at both individual and collective decision-making:

  • Who gets to decide what, and why?
  • Are decision rights clear across levels and teams?
  • Do we trust people to make decisions without escalation? If not, what’s missing?
  • How do we handle disagreement or dissent in a way that moves us forward?
  • When was the last time we made a difficult call, and what helped or hindered us?
  • Do our current decision-making practices reflect our values, or just our urgency?
  • How do we weigh short-term wins against long-term commitments?
  • What do we do when we get it wrong, and how do we recover?

Strategy as a form of collective resilience

When strategy is built into your systems and lived through your decisions, it stops being something only senior or executive leadership hold. It becomes a shared resource, something that strengthens over time and helps the organisation move with more coherence and less confusion. This is what we mean when we say that strategy is not a document, rather it’s the actual infrastructure of what you do. And when this infrastructure is solid, your team doesn’t need to escalate every decision. They already understand what matters

In the end, strategy is a form of care: for your team, who deserve to work with clarity and autonomy; for your communities, who are counting on you to act with purpose and integrity; and, for the work itself, which cannot be sustained without thoughtful structure. If we stop treating strategy as a static plan and start building it as a living system, we give our organisations a far better chance of staying grounded in actual action.

Before writing a new strategy, ask a different question

So the next time someone suggests you need a new strategy, pause for a moment. Ask instead: What needs to be clarified? What needs to be built or strengthened? What already exists, but hasn’t yet been embedded in the way we work? These are the questions that move strategy from intention to infrastructure. And when strategy becomes a system you can stand on, everything else becomes more possible and much easier.

At Gia, we help organisations have these conversations. We pinpoint what’s already working, uncover the gaps, and strengthen the systems that carry your mission forward. This will allow you can navigate complexity with more confidence, make decisions with greater ease, and keep driving your work smoothly towards impact.

Share if this article adds value

Related Articles

Brown and black concrete floor - https://unsplash.com/photos/brown-and-black-concrete-floor-GKFsewk-hz0 Free licensing from unsplash

Why Insurers Must Step Up for Climate-Vulnerable Industries

An Exit Sign in Pink: https://unsplash.com/photos/black-and-pink-exit-signage-9PjefVw5EII

Strategic Exit | The Importance of Designing for When You’re No Longer Needed

Reimagining Risk and Return: The case for a new development finance asset class